An Overview On Psychological Testing Child Custody
Children should be sheltered from careless and un-protective parents. If a divorcee feels that their kids are not safe with a mentally unstable partner, then one can request for psychological testing child custody. To prove a case, judges require both prosecutors and prosecuted undergo a series of mental tests to ascertain the credibility of allegations. Intuitively, cognitively unstable parents may have cases of previously injuring a kid, dependability on certain drugs as well as un-called off parenting behaviors. However, this approach is limited by various reasons such as a number of tests worth carrying out to prove mental stability, inconsistent psychologists, bias including others. Below is a detailed discussion of such limitations.
The identification of which parent to take charge of kids involves various activities. First is the assessment of mental health through a series of interviews. Here, specialists ask individuals a number of questions. However, procedures, questions as well as the design of the interview are not scientifically universal. Therefore, each specialist has their own set of queries and guidelines covering an interview session.
For this reason, quality of assessment is different depending on who performed it. With different questions from various experts, it is impossible to prove that the interview design was proper. Similarly, the expertise of psychologists cannot be proven since one cannot tell if the questions asked were correct or not. Consequently, judges may miss out on giving custody to the best parent.
Interviewing is followed by medical examination. Some conditions are known to largely influence how brains work hence are valuable in cognitive assessment. Such include Rorschach inkblot plus others. While there are many tests, scientists do not give universal guidelines on what every specialist should evaluate. Likewise, no uniform tools are expected to be used across mental health institutions.
Coming up with conclusive information on mental state requires the evaluation of countless medical conditions. Likewise, there are no stipulated tests that cut across. This means while psychologist A decides to perform checks 1, 2 and 3, another can do examination 3, 5 and 6. Relying on those results might, therefore, give wrong conclusions.
At the end of every test, specialists give a list of observations. Notably, behaviors vary with time hence a current examination result does not reflect how individuals will act tomorrow. For example, an alcoholic can decide to stop drinking some time in the future. Relying on such information to identify which parent is worth custody is therefore incorrect. As discussed earlier, tools used in the examination are different depending on a specialist. Likewise, formats vary with experts as well as questions asked. For this reason, observations are biased besides being erroneous. Use of such results thus might hinder sound ruling.
Another process involves the evaluation of check-up outcomes. This may be done by non-specialists representing a certain individual. For this reason, translation is done leaning on one side. Similarly, bias starts from information gathering where assessors gather facts of interest only. It is possible to collaborate with specialists to give false information favoring a client.
The court ruling is expected to be as fair as possible. However, due to biases illustrated in the above points, this is usually not possible.
The identification of which parent to take charge of kids involves various activities. First is the assessment of mental health through a series of interviews. Here, specialists ask individuals a number of questions. However, procedures, questions as well as the design of the interview are not scientifically universal. Therefore, each specialist has their own set of queries and guidelines covering an interview session.
For this reason, quality of assessment is different depending on who performed it. With different questions from various experts, it is impossible to prove that the interview design was proper. Similarly, the expertise of psychologists cannot be proven since one cannot tell if the questions asked were correct or not. Consequently, judges may miss out on giving custody to the best parent.
Interviewing is followed by medical examination. Some conditions are known to largely influence how brains work hence are valuable in cognitive assessment. Such include Rorschach inkblot plus others. While there are many tests, scientists do not give universal guidelines on what every specialist should evaluate. Likewise, no uniform tools are expected to be used across mental health institutions.
Coming up with conclusive information on mental state requires the evaluation of countless medical conditions. Likewise, there are no stipulated tests that cut across. This means while psychologist A decides to perform checks 1, 2 and 3, another can do examination 3, 5 and 6. Relying on those results might, therefore, give wrong conclusions.
At the end of every test, specialists give a list of observations. Notably, behaviors vary with time hence a current examination result does not reflect how individuals will act tomorrow. For example, an alcoholic can decide to stop drinking some time in the future. Relying on such information to identify which parent is worth custody is therefore incorrect. As discussed earlier, tools used in the examination are different depending on a specialist. Likewise, formats vary with experts as well as questions asked. For this reason, observations are biased besides being erroneous. Use of such results thus might hinder sound ruling.
Another process involves the evaluation of check-up outcomes. This may be done by non-specialists representing a certain individual. For this reason, translation is done leaning on one side. Similarly, bias starts from information gathering where assessors gather facts of interest only. It is possible to collaborate with specialists to give false information favoring a client.
The court ruling is expected to be as fair as possible. However, due to biases illustrated in the above points, this is usually not possible.
About the Author:
Get a summary of the things to keep in mind when picking a psychologist and more information about a professional who offers psychological testing child custody purposes at http://www.drjamesrflens.com today.
تعليقات
إرسال تعليق